the dio section?

[lehsreh]

[COLOR=Red]has anyoen else noticed how hard it is to go back and find stuff now? there are tons of pictures that arent even dio stories, yes, they are dioramas, but not dio stories. shouldnt those be in the collection section or something?[/COLOR]

[Urban Saboteur]

Nope. Unless your referring to pictures that are just collection pictures.

The photo's section is for diorama shots that are simply one or two photo dioramas
already self explanatory shots..

the diorama section is for the front page of your diorama.. and your diorama is hosted elsewhere.. with the appropriate story url link filled in.

I think the collection pictures should have their own section, infact i think they do now don't they?

The general photos upload have for very short diorama's of around 3 or so photos.. or one single shot photo that is in itself a diorama.

[lehsreh]

[COLOR=Red]i mean in the dio section there are a lot of just pictures. i know some post dios in pages of 3, much like Self-Modifier and the group dio weekend warriors thing. i understand these, what im talking about are pictures in the dio section that have no story. [/COLOR]

[Urban Saboteur]

Ah right.. well I dunno about those.. usually when people upload a one shot dio it goes in the photos section.. :confused: at least that's what I thought..
the diorama's that are hosted elsewhere have one shot but with a story link.. I totally wasn't aware that people have posted up one shots in the diorama section..
maybe they should be moved to the photos section.

The collection section is for peoples collection pictures, so I dont think they should go in there.

[Hammerfel]

The Dioramas section was originally for Dio-stories, but i can see how someone would put a diorama set photo there, and I don't really mind. A photo of a dio set should probably go in the Photos section, and its ok with me if the author or Sonn moves it, but otherwise they are fine to be included in there. I don't like to be too rigid with the rules. It stifles creativity.