|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-10-2010, 09:15 AM
|
#1
|
G.I.JOE ITALIAN COLLECTOR
Offline
-->
Posts: 27,808
-->
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
Why not Billy!?
I'm asked to myself, why a central figure in the Hama's Joe-verse like Billy (Cobra Commander'son) has never had his own action figure from Hasbro...
|
|
|
09-10-2010, 10:00 AM
|
#2
|
ARAH for O-ringers
Offline
-->
Posts: 6,074
-->
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Because Hasbro sucks. Repaints work better for them.
__________________
HEROES DON'T DIE, THEY JUST RELOAD
|
|
|
09-10-2010, 10:35 AM
|
#3
|
I'm insane
Offline
-->
Posts: 3,125
-->
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Why no Billy
They probably had a meeting at Hasbro and found it was not cost effective to make an eye patch!! I think the real reason is that Billy: along with Bongo, Hard Master, Soft Master, Professor Apell, Dr. Burkhart are Larry Hama's tie in characters. Larry was given the job to sell the main action figures that Hasbro created,produced: and make them look good in the Marvel comic book plot. These tie in characters were used to help enhance overall storylines in the comic; but were never intended to become action figures. I think the October Guard were tie in characters but they became so popular Hasbro realized they could make money off them and eventually decided to make them. Eventually in 1993 Hasbro was cranking out silly looking figures the public didn't like and not even Hama's excellent writing ability could save the line. Just a theory.
Last edited by rds13601 : 09-10-2010 at 12:41 PM.
|
|
|
09-10-2010, 03:35 PM
|
#4
|
Veteran
Offline
-->
Posts: 1,055
-->
Join Date: Feb 2005
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rds13601
They probably had a meeting at Hasbro and found it was not cost effective to make an eye patch!! I think the real reason is that Billy: along with Bongo, Hard Master, Soft Master, Professor Apell, Dr. Burkhart are Larry Hama's tie in characters. Larry was given the job to sell the main action figures that Hasbro created,produced: and make them look good in the Marvel comic book plot. These tie in characters were used to help enhance overall storylines in the comic; but were never intended to become action figures. I think the October Guard were tie in characters but they became so popular Hasbro realized they could make money off them and eventually decided to make them. Eventually in 1993 Hasbro was cranking out silly looking figures the public didn't like and not even Hama's excellent writing ability could save the line. Just a theory.
|
Except they didn't actually do the guard until 2005, Red Star was done but his comic appearence looked nothing like his figure, Big Bear, Volga ect were not part of the comics
If it wasn't cost effective to make an eye patch then why did Major Bludd have one?
I think it actually has more to do with the moneys they would have to pay Marvel cause these characters are technically owned by Marvel. Hasbro only licenced characters they created, the other characters automaticly fell to Marvel. I know there was some talk when the OG comic packs came out that there was some legal rangling that had to be done and Marvel got a kickback for the OG, also when the DD comics came out they had to do some more wrangling to get Billy in there. Ironicly the characters can't be used anywhere else so they are trapped in limbo until someone makes a deal. Comic character law is very complicated.
|
|
|
09-10-2010, 04:12 PM
|
#5
|
ARAH for O-ringers
Offline
-->
Posts: 6,074
-->
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Was Larry Hama employed by Hasbro or Marvel?
__________________
HEROES DON'T DIE, THEY JUST RELOAD
|
|
|
09-10-2010, 04:45 PM
|
#6
|
I'm insane
Offline
-->
Posts: 3,125
-->
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Why no Billy
Hama was for sure employed by Marvel. He certainly must have had meetings with Hasbro. Hasbro would unveil a figure and Hama would find a way to work that figure into the comic book. I distinctly remember in the letter to the editor pages that there were complaints as to the wild colors fo certain figures. His response to readers was for them to contact Hasbro. As for the eyepatch that was a joke. I agree with Zedhatch about the OG being a Marvel licensed property. However, I think most of the characters are Hasbro's. Btw the Stinger jeep is really modelled after a Lamborghini SUV.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.6 Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Style Design By: vBStyles.com
|
|